A responsible enterprise, before the product price changes, should inform consumers in advance, so that consumers make the right purchasing choices and judgments. As upstream chemical raw materials of price (main is oil products), as daily chemical enterprise of joint Lee China of products price this this is very normal of things, in price Qian fulfil inform obligations, this is normal program, however a is normal of commercial behavior, Shanghai prices sector is to "spread price information, disrupt market price order" on joint Lee China (China) limited out 2 million Yuan ticket.
Unilever (China) after weighing says: respect for national development and Reform Commission and the Shanghai Municipal Bureau of price decisions. On the development and Reform Commission (ii) adjusting fuel prices, if companies such as Unilever as a week to predict consumer, I think Chinese people will never be considered "disrupting the market price order", but rather respect for consumers to purchase the right to choose.
I'd have to ask the relevant departments, every price is the middle of the publication, not to the consumer buffer period, even the stability of the market, do not disturb order? it is typical practice tool Rob openly, afterwards have forced consumers to support their wise decision. Such as Unilever, Procter, libai and nice fully market-oriented enterprises, who dare not easily price increases, because once the price for these enterprises, is losing market share, reputation and enterprise image, as long as there is a trace of compression costs of space, I believe they will not choose price. For the market fully competitive enterprises, in order to survive and develop, they rely on only the customer, if the price rises, there is a risk of losing customers, once the customer loss, survival of the enterprise crisis occur.
These enterprises have the courage to risk losing customers ' appreciation of risk, the only reason is the high costs of raw materials to enhance the internal management and optimization of production which digestive, price was their choice of last resort. In the Chinese environment, administrators accustomed to authoritarian powers under the monopoly of power, should be given to the rights of independent pricing, want to control in their hands, so only in order to control prices, and interviewed the ridiculous behavior of enterprises. Who interviewed you, you also have the price of desire, take one or two companies centesimate, how can I display of man's authoritarian.
Unilever is punishment, you can only recognize plant, place you there is no appeal and reasoning, you can toss, I dare you to death, forced into your "mental illness", Unilever is also well aware that the authoritarian, and had to with respect to accommodate the power hidden rules. I wrote many times, and for mastering basic resources and raw materials in the upper reaches of the State-owned monopoly, to really understand "State-owned" the meaning of State is the key time to stabilize prices, bears responsibility for the benefit of the profit, rather than wearing the "State-owned" coat, cruelly oppress and exploit the common people, become a tool for collection and scrape flesh and blood of the people. State-owned enterprises to create trillions of thousands of huge profits, in addition to the price is no other idea? large salary drop a drop of management, improve productivity, reduction of unnecessary redundant staff in the management, drop a drop profit index, do you still need the price? you water oil and gas prices, Terminal consumer goods prices, this is ironclad rule.
Your relevant departments to interview PetroChina, Sinopec!? Punishment of Unilever, is do you will be able to control the stability of prices? I have had experience of working in foreign companies, foreign companies on the cost of control is one of the enterprise simply cannot match, if such as Unilever, Procter and the price of daily chemical giants are forced to stage, daily chemical enterprises in the country estimated few defy. These enterprises in order to survive, or changing the packaging, reducing the dose, secretly implemented price increases. Under the status of the production, the loss or job cuts, reduced production, social instability caused by unemployment.
At the same time, both from a management level, production technology and financial strength, domestic enterprises are top but giants such as Unilever and Procter, price of primitive disbelief does not practice these international giants are likely to take advantage of cheap merger of domestic enterprises provide golden opportunities, eventually form larger monopolies, consumers have no right to speak of. For a simple view of punishment sector Unilever, and prices stable. In the area of business intelligence and business savvy, I dare not say that our Government officials are pig's brain, but you can take off the gloves level of say your point is simply to play however Enterprise operators and managers. Did you fine the enterprise is? do you not let enterprise price is? business is by way of secret price up for, the enterprise social burden by layoffs, business is supply shortage of suitable make, markets could not follow. In the enterprise in a changing market environment, survival and development needs. Simple punishment of enterprises, in a short time appears to be maintaining price stability and the interests of consumers. However, the departments thought not, because you can't play the power of a good time, Enterprise survival once down, resulting in supply shortages, caused dramatic surge and volatility of prices, to the social problems brought about by you ever not? many seemingly wise of the Government, but MI-LAN-gold.
