the "shopkeeper charged $ 1200 by the training fee is in fact a disguised form of deposit, when I quit each other nor refunded. "On March 25, the evening public Xiao Wu to reflect.
2010 year in October, Xiaowu came to Lusong District beautiful fashion model shop, at that time, the shop does not enter into labor contracts with him, after a few months, he appears on the wages of a deduction to be known as the "training".
"I did not participate in any training, the money is in fact a deposit without receipts, or invoice, and most of the staff in the shop being the ' training '. "Xiao Wu said.
this year on March 20, Xiao Wu resigned, when he asked the owner when the money back, they call, employees have done for two years, otherwise collect training fees cannot be refunded. Subsequently, Xiao Wu will be reflected in the labour sector.
25 morning, reporters accompanying Xiaowu came to the shop. Shopkeeper said Tan Hongtao, Xiao Wu does not comply with labour discipline in the shop, often come to work late and leave early. He said that collect training fees is the etiquette of the Salon industry, and refused to return, "he if only for a few days, so do not do, that my loss who is going to make up for. "
then, this reporter went to Lusong District labor supervision team. A surname Chen staff member said, they have been informed of this matter, has to ask the store issued record and investigate.
"staff training fees employer has strict rules must be approved by the municipal Labour Bureau training institutions, units also provide receipts and invoices to employees. "Mr Chen said if verified beauty salon take name of training to staff in disguise received the deposit, they will be financial penalties on the store, and request the return of" training ".
